/lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender

d836e239f3cbbde2bee2357453357437f94a7225c9143c94bacafe3fabea9102.jpg
[Hide] (45KB, 593x482) Reverse

>>3043

769261f8b12265cb6224ffd7609f1e710855223b9d2ea378c91c6a9af3288cc3.jpg
[Hide] (368.9KB, 2048x1634) Reverse

>>3046
>>3044

Marge why marge.moe doesn't work?

Skajyos why did you deleted a self-portrait of a topless hebe? She's not naked underneath so it's not da sea pea. Please stop ruleclit.

>>3164
i left those two up because i found them on google images and they're just "artistic photographs"

the third one didn't show up so i assume it's cp 

if you find deleting cp unreasonable on clearnet then please just go back to whatever secret club that you considered "non-rulecuked" 

as you can see nobody really likes these images but nobody is seething about it either since they'd just report this site instead

>>3164
btw you probably have done more harm to this site than the raiders since porkbun wouldn't have even cared about the reports if it wasn't for your jailbait drama

>>3168
wtf? I like these images. Just because I don't announce it doesn't mean I don't

>>3170
switched ip again?

>>3171
How many you gonna accuse to be same person if they like hebes?

>>3172
idk maybe just my instinct of being a janny 

still i'm really sick of seeing you people asking me to allow child porn on this site, you are the reason why jaksoy.party is on clienthold 

it's not even like an ironic joke, you're actually asking me to allow explicit images of irl children and crying about how "rulecucked" i am for merely removing the files so raiders have nothing to report to the feds 

just shut up

>>3173
soot make /noctulian/

>>3173
You making up claims like "nobody likes these images" and then you hate on us for trying to defend ourselves? So what did you expect opening a "pedo" board if you hate pedos? I am the guy who been asking you this for awhile now, I am not the guy posting hebes, I am genuinely curious.

>>3175
I would prefer /satanlarp/ or simple /x/ tbh

>>3173
Skajyos... I am sincerely want to know what are your views. You think all of this is ironic joke? Personally I don't like lolicon, and that drawn toddler shit that was posted above is just cringe. But do you unironically believe that all pedos here are just ironic? About 90% of entire world  male population find hebes attractive, within the 12-16 years age. The soytoddlers are immature enough to accept that yet.

>>3178
i don't care what's legal in your country or what statics you have, if it's not allowed on clearnet then it means it could get this site taken down, that's all i can tell you

>>3179
Fair enough, I just want to confirm that you accept that we aren't all just ironic shitposters.
You said you allow jailbait, and topless hebe is imho within legal range as she still has no visible butthole and vagina.
I don't see how "artistic" photos of naked children are given the pass but if a teen makes photo of herself topless but bottom is invisible then it's suddenly a cp, or if it was a photo of a topless teen guy in shorts it would still pass. It just doesn't make sense to me, I am NOT pushing you to "allow x", I just want to understand how do you draw the line.

>>3180
> I just want to understand how do you draw the line.
it's only how the domain registrar draws the line that matters

>>3181
Sure but I can find lots of topless hebes within .com or on yandex browser. That's why I believe topless girls should given the pass, but for the love of God I don't push anyone to do anything. Topless adult women should given the pass too. The butthole and vagoo, I think not

>>3168
I wouldn't post them if I wasn't asked them to return to this site, afterall I was told that you allow jailbait now and I try to only post stuff within the rational legal range. If registrar allow adult porn, zoosadism, and what you call "artistic photographs", I thought it would allow something as innocent as topless hebes...
I only called you a "ruleclit" as a joke, I didn't meant it as an insult...

1405 - b99cd0a7de0299d8a65f0491f4bc17b4.jpg
[Hide] (67.5KB, 500x425) Reverse

>>3168
>>3173
Personally I wouldn't post on this site if not for the allowing of hebes to be posted, so yes I like these images. So far nothing illegal has been posted, aside from JM series of the other lita guy. 

Topless hebes are wholesome, I've yet to find anyone who didn't like them unironically. It's sad if your domain wouldn't allow posting of them, but I guess there is nothing anyone can do anything about it if that is the case.

>>3185
On what site would you post then?
Where on the internet do they allow topless hebes apart maybe from kohlchan?

>>3187
imgsrc.ru allow almost fully naked children, and yet it's a normie clearnet hosting website like Pinterest

>>3190
kek, archive probably doesn't give a shit about their complaints.
Also just to prove I was correct, you can even find stiff like this that been up for ages on that site. Skajyos plz don't ruleclit the link: https://imgsrc.ru/b.bedniak/38623172.html

>>3212
Shit I missed the gem, what was that?

>>3213
data:text/html;base64,KHB0aGMpIE5FVyAyMDE3IFBlZG8gQ2hpbGRsb3ZlciA4eW8gRGFkZHkncyBMaXR0bGUgR2lybCBKTSAxNi5tcDQ=

>>3214
all I see is the filename

>>3214
Post the gems plz